Beta Male/Provider Shaming vs. Alpha "Lover"

Great video.

But what is going on here. Like on a deeper level, what forces a girl to put you in the provider box. 

What subcommunication did tyler change from the first example to the second. The second video clip is really short so it's hard to get an idea of his behaviour. I suppose his frame is solid as fuck and he doesn't give a fuck in the first example 

Dude you should be able to see it very clearly. Well hear it anyway ;). You already know the answer it's screaming at you. 

Yah I don't know how I missed that.

He was too nice, not polarizing enough, no standards for what behaviour he accepts. 

This is exactly what I needed to hear

llol owens smirk as he gets into the car what a motherfuckere

Yeah that pissed me off a bit cuz I can identify with the shaming in the past. I think on the deepest level

this video shows the contrast between guys that value themselves as a man vs. Men that value their achievements and material wealth. However, I think a provider with solid game is a deadly combination but it's very very rare 

This is amazing, love the perspectives of both predominant male types and the female's reactions to them.

This is a good video but honestly Tyler is making WAY too big of a jump by saying the females label those guys as "providers." There's no evidence to back up this statement, HOWEVER they were being very incongruent which caused them to react the way they did. Simple. I feel like RSD tends to suffer from too much broscience analysis.

I feel like tyler was pretty damn spot on. At first it did seem like he was making too many assumptions and kinda being a dick, but I think he was exposing a harsh reality. He was belittling the "providers" because he is trying to cause them to have a reaction, maybe even get a bit angry so they feel motivated to becoming a seducer.

The example he gives of Bill Clinton vs a rockstar is because when you act incongruent to your identity it pisses people off/causes them to not like you. This is what is causing the negative reactions not the girls consciously or unconsciously categorizing them as "providers." Its too specific of a term, and even gives people the wrong idea in a way IMO

I like everything else about the video though

You NAILED it. What's the big flaw here? Anyone who's done training should see it. 

Tonality and emotion

Yes and projection. 

This is also true. The vid did its job. 

Great video